State responsibility for protecting the right of access to a court during an artificial intelligence attack
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/bpf.2025.02Keywords:
Right of access to a court, Rule of Law, Right to a lawful judge, Artificial Intelligence, Random Court Case Allocation System, Independence of the JudiciaryAbstract
The contribution provides a comparative view of the involvement of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary in the modern world. It contrasts this with the situation in Slovakia and highlights the dangers of introducing Artificial Intelligence into the Judiciary without careful consideration. It specifically addresses the issue of integrating Artificial Intelligence into the Random Court Case Allocation System. It warns of the threat to the right to a lawful judge due to arbitrary interference in the Random Court Case Allocation System through Artificial Intelligence.
References
1. Artificial Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft for Suggestions from Scholars). (中华人民共和国人工智能法（学者建议稿)). Official WeChat (微信) account of the Digital Rule of Law Institute at East China University of Political Science and Law (华东政法大学数字法治研究院),March16,2024. Dostupné na: <https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/t0592_china_ai_law_draft_EN.pdf>.
2. CARLUCCI, William M.: - STONE, Kaityn E. – ZOGBY, Michael C. – SAROKHANIAN, Nicholas A.: Supreme Courts Of Delaware And Georgia Take Steps To Regulate The Use Of Artificial Intelligence. Mondaq. 30 October 2024. Dostupné na: <https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/new-technology/1536016/supreme-courts-of-delaware-and-georgia-take-steps-to-regulate-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence>.
3. ChinaDaily. Xinhua. Hangzhou Internet Court. 2018-08-18. Dostupné na: <https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201808/18/WS5b77c8f4a310add14f386801.html>.
4. China Law Translate: Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services 2023/07/13. Dostupné na: <https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/generative-ai-interim/>.
5. China Law Translate: Regulations on Deep Integration Management of Internet Information Services. 2022/11/25. Dostupné na: <https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/deep-synthesis/>.
6. China Law Translate: Regulations on the Management of Algorithm Recommendations for Internet Information Services. 2021/12/31. Dostupné na: < https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/algorithms/>.
7. DIXON, Herbert, B.: American Bar Association. Guidelines for Judicial Officers. Use of Artificial Intelligence. In. The Judges’ Journal. Maz 06, 2025. Dostupné na: <https://www.americanbar.org/groups/judicial/resources/judges-journal/2025-spring/guidelines-judicial-officers-responsible-use-artificial-intelligence/>.
8. DORWART, Hunter – QU, Harry – BRÄUTIGAM, Tobias – GONG, James: IAAP. Preparing for compliance: Key differences between EU, Chinese AI regulations. 5 Feb 2025. Dostupné na: <https://iapp.org/news/a/preparing-for-compliance-key-differences-between-eu-chinese-ai-regulations>.
9. DU, Guodong a kol.: China Justice Observer. China Amends Civil Procedure Law with Focus on Online Litigation. 22 Jan 2022. Dostupné na: <https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/china-amends-civil-procedure-law-with-focus-on-online-litigation>.
10. Európska etická charta o používaní umelej inteligencie v súdnych systémoch a ich prostredí.
11. Executive Order 14110, titled Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. November 02, 2023 a October 30, 2023. Dostupné na: <https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/briefing-room/2023/11/01/omb-releases-implementation-guidance-following-president-bidens-executive-order-on-artificial-intelligence/ a <https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/>.
12. Hangzhou Internet Court. Dostupné na: <https://www.netcourt.gov.cn/?lang=En>.
13. LIEBERKNECHT, Nicholas: From innovation to exposure: artificial intelligence risks for legal professionals. Reuters. 2025. online. July 14, 2025. Dostupné na: <https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/innovation-exposure-artificial-intelligence-risks-legal-professionals-2025-07-14/>.
14. MALIK, Saf: Capacity a technological brand. AI now lies, denies, and plots: OpenAI’s o1 model caught attempting self-replication. July 08, 2025. Dostupné na: <https://www.capacitymedia.com/article-ai-now-lies-denies-and-plots>.
15. M-25-21. Memorandum for the Heads of executive departments and agencies. April 3, 2025. Dostupné na: <https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/M-25-21-Accelerating-Federal-Use-of-AI-through-Innovation-Governance-and-Public-Trust.pdf>.
16. M-25-22. Memorandum for the Heads of executive departments and agencies. April 3, 2025. Dostupné na: <https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/M-25-22-Driving-Efficient-Acquisition-of-Artificial-Intelligence-in-Government.pdf>.
17. Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2023/2844 z 13. decembra 2023 o digitalizácii justičnej spolupráce a prístupu k spravodlivosti v cezhraničných občianskych, obchodných a trestných veciach a o zmene niektorých aktov v oblasti justičnej spolupráce, Dostupné na: .
18. MALIK, Zainab – LANGEN, Maaike – BARBIERI, Mariana Piccinin – LENZ, Roland a TEPOVA, Tatyana: How can we leverage AI to solve justice problems for all?. March 17,2025. Dostupné na: <https://oecd.ai/en/wonk/how-can-we-leverage-ai-to-solve-justice-problems-for-all>.
19. Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2024/1689 z 13. júna 2024, ktorým sa stanovujú harmonizované pravidlá v oblasti umelej inteligencie a ktorým sa menia nariadenia (ES) č. 300/2008, (EÚ) č. 167/2013, (EÚ) č. 168/2013, (EÚ) 2018/858, (EÚ) 2018/1139 a (EÚ) 2019/2144 a smernice 2014/90/EÚ, (EÚ) 2016/797 a (EÚ) 2020/1828 (akt o umelej inteligencii). Dostupné na: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401689>.
20. National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity of Standardization Administration of China (SAC/TC260; 全国网络安全标准化技术委员会): TC260-003 Basic Security Requirements for Generative Artificial Intelligence Services. February 29,2024. Dostupné na: <https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/china-safety-requirements-for-generative-ai-final/>.
21. PINTEROVÁ, Dominika: Odpoveď generatívnej umelej inteligencie a dôkaz v súdnom konaní. Justičná revue, 2025, č.8-9, v tlači.
22. PIRSING, Maynard E., GLENDON, Mary Ann: Legal Ethics, Encyclopedia Britannica. 8 June 2023. American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Dostupné na: <https://www.britannica.com/topic/legal-ethics>.
23. OECD (2024). International: OECD publishes report on use of AI in the public sector. DataGuidance. OneTrust DataGuidance. June 18, 2024. Dostupné na: <https://www.dataguidance.com/news/international-oecd-publishes-report-use-ai-public>.
24. Prejudiciálna otázka z 26. februára 2025 vo veci Rowicz. č. C-159/25.
25. Rada Európskej únie. Závery Rady „Prístup k spravodlivosti a využívanie príležitostí, ktoré prináša digitalizácia“ 2020/C 342 I/01. Dostupné na: <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SK/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52020XG1014(01) >.
26. RASSI, J. Možnosti a meze využití umělé inteligence v občansko-právním řizení. Justičná revue, 2025, č. 10, v tlači.
27. State of Connecticut Judicial Branch: Responsible AI Framework for the State of Connecticut Judicial Branch. JBAPPM Policy 1013. February 1, 2024. Dostupné na: <https://www.jud.ct.gov/faq/CTJBResponsibleAIPolicyFramework2.1.24.pdf>.
28. Rozhodnutie ESĽP z 26. septembra 1996 vo veci Diennet proti Francúzsku. č.18160/91.
29. Rozhodnutie ESĽP z 12. januára 2016 vo veci Miracle Europe kft. proti Maďarsku. č. 57774/13.
30. Rozhodnutie ESĽP z 15. júla 2021 vo veci Komisia proti Poľsku (Disciplinárny režim sudcov). č. C-791/19.
31. Rozhodnutie Mata v. Avianca, Inc., United States District Court, S.D. New York. Jun 22, 2023. Dostupné na: <https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6499235932898b72d5cfb1aa>.
32. Rozhodnutie Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., United States District Court, E.D. Texas. Nov 25, 2024. Dostupné na: <https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/6746a063e8c044126187cfea>.
33. Rozhodnutie Najvyššieho správneho súdu Poľska („Najwyzsi Sąd Administracyjny“) z 19. apríla 2021 (č. III. OSK 836/21).
34. Rozsudok SD EÚ z 26. marca 2020 vo veci Simpson proti Rade a HG proti Komisii. č. C-542/18.
35. Rozsudok SD EÚ z 5. júna 2023 Komisia proti Poľsku (Nezávislosť a súkromný život sudcov). č. C-204/21.
36. SVÁK, J.: Ústavnoprávny rozmer zverejňovania súdnych rozhodnutí na internete. Justičná revue, 55, 2003, č. 3, s. 239.
37. SVÁK, J. Zásada zákazu odňatia veci zákonnému sudcovi. Justičná revue, č. 3/1993, s. 22-28.
38. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. AI and the NYS Judiciary: A Preliminary Path. Committee Reports. June 3, 2024. Dostupné na: <https://www.nycbar.org/reports/ai-and-the-nys-judiciary-a-preliminary-path/>.
39. The Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China. SPC launches AI-generated platform to help judges, public. 2024/11/16. Dostupné na: <https://english.court.gov.cn/2024-11/16/c_1053704.htm>.
40. The Utah Judiciary’s HR. Judicial Council Rules Regarding AI. Beginning October 25, 2023. Dostupné na:
<https://sites.google.com/utcourts.gov/courts-hr/policy/ai-information>.
41. Vyhláška Ministerstva spravodlivosti Slovenskej republiky č. 534/2005 Z. z. o Spravovacom a kancelárskom poriadku pre okresné súdy, krajské súdy, Špeciálny súd a vojenské súdy.
42. Zákon o Občianskom práve procesnom Čínskej republiky. Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (第十六条). WIPO Lex. Dostupné na: <https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/zh/legislation/details/22186>.
43. Zákon č. 757/2004 Z. z. o súdoch a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov.
44. ZHENG, G., George. China’s Grand Design of People’s Smart Courts. Cambrige University Press. 2020. ISSN: 2052-9023 (Online) a Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , October 2020 , pp. 561 - 582. Dostupné na: <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-law-and-society/article/chinas-grand-design-of-peoples-smart-courts/476879522161B47A5BE10DBC4BDE8215> https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.20>.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ján Svák, Mariana Bieliková
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
