Unfair Business Practices in Digital Marketing and their Legal Consequences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/bpf.2025.20Keywords:
unfair competition, consumer protection, digital marketing, advertising, online platformsAbstract
The article examines unfair commercial practices employed by traders in the online environment. Unfair commercial practices may adversely affect both B2B and B2C relationships, while the regulation of this area can be characterised as multilayered, encompassing elements of both private and public law. This complexity directly influences the tools and mechanisms available for the enforcement of rights by parties affected by unfair competition. Particular attention is devoted to the interaction between traditional commercial law concepts and the new obligations imposed on major digital platforms under recent regulatory instruments, which substantially shape the effectiveness of protection against unfair practices. The aim of the article is to delineate the legal framework governing unfair commercial practices, with an emphasis on the enforcement of relevant claims both vis-à-vis competitors engaging in unfair presentation of goods and services and vis-à-vis consumers or users of such goods and services. A partial objective is the analysis of the regulatory obligations of entities enabling the presentation or marketing of products, with specific regard to the duties stemming from the Digital Services Act in the context of online advertising. The verified hypothesis assumes that the regulatory framework provides an equivalent level of protection to both categories of stakeholders—traders and consumers alike.
References
1. AO, Lie - BANSAL, Rohit - PRUTHI, Nishita - KHASKHELI, Muhammad Bilawal: Impact of Social Media Influencers on Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention: A Meta Analysis. Sustainability [online]. 2023, roč. 15, č. 3, s. 2 [cit. dátum 2025 08 22]. DOI: 10.3390/su15032744.
2. BOGOJEVIĆ, Sanja. Regulating Greenwashing: Where Market Rules Meet Climate Action. Journal of Environmental Law, 2025, roč. 37, č. 2, s. 169–174. DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqaf019.
3. Bundesgerichtshof zur Pflicht von Influencerinnen, ihre Instagram-Beiträge als Werbung zu kennzeichnen. Pressemitteilung [online]. Nr. 170/2021, 9. 9. 2021. Dostupné na: https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2021/2021170.htm, navštívené dňa: 27.09.2025
4. DI PORTO, Fabiana - EGBERTS, Alexander: The collective welfare dimension of dark patterns regulation. In: European Law Journal, 2023, roč. 29, č. 1–2, s. 114–141. DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12478.
5. ERSHOV, Daniel – MITCHELL, Matthew. The Effects of Advertising Disclosure Regulations on Social Media: Evidence From Instagram. RAND Journal of Economics, 2025, roč. 56, č. 1, s. 74–90. DOI: 10.1111/1756-2171.12493, s. 87
6. ESPOSITO Fabrizio - Ferreira , Maciel Cathoud T. Addictive Design as an Unfair Commercial Practice: The Case of Hyper-Engaging Dark Patterns. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2024;15(4):999-1016. doi:10.1017/err.2024.8, p. 999
7. Etický kódex reklamnej praxe, dostupné na: https://rpr.sk/sk/eticky-kodex, navštívené dňa: 27.09.2025
8. HERMAN, Johanna: Dark patterns: EU’s regulatory efforts. Security & Privacy [online]. 2024, 7(6), e441. DOI: 10.1002/spy2.441.
9. ISOLA, Cecilia - ESPOSITO, Fabrizio: A systematic literature review on dark patterns for the legal community: definitional clarity and a legal classification based on the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Computer Law & Security Review [online]. 2025, 58, 106169. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106169.
10. Rada pre reklamu, Legislatíva, dostupné na: https://rpr.sk/sk/zakony-o-reklame/, navštívené dňa: 27.09.2025
11. Rozsudok Súdneho dvora zo dňa 04. júla 2023, Meta Platforms a i. (Conditions générales d’utilisation d’un réseau social), C-252/21, ECLI:EU:C:2023:537, bod 150
12. STRÉMY, Jana - ZLOCHA, Ľubomír.: Nekalá súťaž alebo tenká hranica medzi zeleným marketingom a greenwashingom? In: ADAMOVÁ, Z. (ed.) Nové technológie, internet a duševné vlastníctvo 6: Označovanie produktov. Trnava: Typi Universitatis Tyrnaviensis -VEDA SAV, 2024, s. 87-99. ISBN 978 80 568 0709 5, s. 99
13. STRÉMY, Jana: Nekalá súťaž influencerov? In: Neštandardné legislatívne zásahy štátu v neštandardných situáciách : pocta profesorovi Milanovi Ďuricovi. 1. vyd. Banská Bystrica: Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela -Belianum, 2023, s. 303-329. ISBN 978-80-557-2058-6, s. 326
14. WOLTERS, Pieter – ZUIDERVEEN BORGESIUS, Frederik. The EU Digital Services Act: what does it mean for online advertising and adtech. International Journal of Law and Information Technology [online]. 2025, dostupné na: https://academic.oup.com/ijlit/article/doi/10.1093/ijlit/eaaf004/8133991?utm_source=chatgpt.com&login=fals, navštívené dňa: 28.09.2025
15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Digital Services Act: Questions and Answers. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future, dostupné na: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/digital-services-act-questions-and-answers, navštívené dňa 28.09.2025
16. EURÓPSKA KOMISIA. Oznámenie Komisie — Usmernenie k výkladu a uplatňovaniu smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady 2005/29/ES o nekalých obchodných praktikách podnikateľov voči spotrebiteľom na vnútornom trhu, Ú. v. EÚ C 526, 29.12.2021, pp. 1–129
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Simona Rudohradská

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.