The Evolution of the Demotic Marital Legal Tradition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46282/bpf.2025.49Keywords:
Demotic legal traditions, marital traditions, Egypt, papyri, Roman lawAbstract
In the Roman provinces, the blending of different legal cultures was a common phenomenon, and the province of Egypt, the subject of this paper, was no exception. Preserved papyri from this region illustrate the development of legal traditions and how they influenced one another and changed over time. These sources show the complexity of legal and social life in the province and that, despite the long-term influence of Greek legal culture and the Roman conquest, certain Egyptian legal traditions remained in use. This paper examines a specific Demotic marital legal tradition and its development. The aim is to examine the tradition’s development under changing social conditions and assess whether these transformations led to its weakening or disappearance, by analyzing primary sources, secondary literature, and a comparison of the Ptolemaic and Roman legal environments. It can thus be observed that provincial inhabitants were able to preserve some Egyptian legal traditions, partly due to the favorable legal arrangements they offered, which also testifies to the Romans' tolerance for the local legal culture. The paper’s contribution is to address development of the Demotic marital legal tradition under Roman administration, which is a topic not often discussed in the Slovak academic discourse.
References
1. ALONSO, José Luis: Agraphos gamos: Marriage, Family and Inheritance in Roman Egypt. In: SCHEIBELREITER, P. (ed.): Symposion 2022: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Gmunden, 22.–24. August 2022). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2023, s. 407–454 ISBN: 978-3-7001-9564-1.
2. BURKHALTER, Fabienne: Archives locales et archives centrales en Egypte romaine In: Chiron. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 1990, roč. 20, s. 191–216. ISSN: 2510-5396.
3. BLATNICKÁ, Veronika: Právne aspekty uzatvárania manželstva v rímskom a provinčnom práve [diplomová práca]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Právnická fakulta, 2025. 85 s.
4. CAPPONI, Livia: Augustan Egypt: The Creation of a Roman Province. London – New York: Routledge, 2005, 308 s. ISBN 978‑0‑415‑97217‑8.
5. DEPAUW, Mark: Autograph Confirmation in Demotic Private Contracts. In: Chronique d’Égypte, roč. 78 (2003), s. 66–111. ISSN 0009-7067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.CDE.2.309213
6. GRIFFITH, F. Ll. P. Cairo 30646 [online]. Durham: Duke University; Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg; New York: Columbia University, 2006–. [cit. 2025-09-01]. Dostupné na: https://papyri.info/dclp/55857.
7. EVANS GRUBBS, Judith: Parent–Child Conflict in the Roman Family: The Evidence of the Code of Justinian. In: GEORGE, Michele (ed.): The Roman Family in the Empire: Rome, Italy, and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, s. 93 – 129. ISBN 0-19-926841-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268412.003.04
8. JOHNSON, Janet H. (ed.): The Demotic Dictionary of the Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures of the University of Chicago [online]. Chicago: Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures, 2001–. [cit. 2025-09-04]. Dostupné na: https://isac.uchicago.edu/research/publications/chicago-demotic-dictionary.
9. KATO, Ikuyo: Demotic Matrimonial Property Contracts Recorded in the sꜥnḫ-Documents: A Re-Examination of the Term “sꜥnḫ.” In: Orient, roč. 43 (2008), s. 119–138. ISSN: 1884-1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5356/orient.43.119
10. KEENAN, James G. – MANNING, J. G. – YIFTACH-FIRANKO, Uri (ed.).: Law and Legal Practice in Egypt from Alexander to the Arab Conquest: A Selection of Papyrological Sources in Translation, with Introductions and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 598 s. ISBN 978-0-521-87452-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139050869
11. LANDGRÁFOVÁ, Renata – MÍČKOVÁ, Diana: Setne Chamvaset – nezvedený syn faraona Vesermaatrea? In: Prague Egyptological Studies, roč. 20 (2018), s. 71–78. ISSN 1801-3899.
12. MAEHLER, Herwig: Greek, Egyptian and Roman Law. In: The Journal of Juristic Papyrology, roč. 35 (2005), s. 121-140. ISSN: 0075-4277.
13. MORWOOD, James – TAYLOR, John: The Pocket Oxford Classical Greek Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 449 s. ISBN 0-19-860512-9.
14. PESTMAN, Pieter W.: Marriage and Matrimonial Property in Ancient Egypt: A Contribution to Establishing the Legal Position of the Woman. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1961. 232 s. (Papyrologica Lugduno-Batava IX). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004429994_014
15. P.Oxy. II 237 [online]. Durham: Duke University; Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg; New York: Columbia University, 2006–. [cit. 2025-09-23]. Dostupné na: https://papyri.info/ddbdp/p.oxy;2;237.
16. THOMPSON, Herbert: A Family Archive from Siut: from Papyri in the British Museum, including an Account of a Trial before the Laocritae in the Year B.C. 170. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934. 148 s.
17. VINSON, Steve: Strictly Tabubue: The Legacy of an Ancient Egyptian Femme Fatale. In: Kmt: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt, roč. 22, č. 3 (2011), s. 47–57. ISSN 1053-0827.
18. YIFTACH-FIRANKO, Uri: Marriage and Marital Arrangements: A History of the Greek Marriage Document in Egypt, 4th Century BCE - 4th Century CE. München: C.H. Beck, 2003, 381 s. ISBN 3406511678.
19. Zákon č. 40/1964 Občiansky zákonník.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Veronika Blatnická
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
